Local Calumet weather
 

Click Here For Complete Weather
 

Keweenaw Commentary...See What Everyone’Äôs Talking About!!!!

Click Here For Keweenaw Today Click Here For Keweenaw CommentaryClick Here For Keweenaw Today

Copper Harbor Utility Board seeks sewer data for Hunters Point developer

Utility Board members met on Mar. 16 with MJO President Mick Oja, far left, to discuss his company’Äôs request for sewer services to accommodate a development proposed for Hunters Point, west of Copper Harbor. Pictured at the table are, from left, Rich Harrer, Copper Harbor sewage treatment system operator; Peg Kauppi, Utility Board member; Ken Korhorn, Grant Township supervisor and Utility Board member; Richard Supina, president of Traverse Engineering and engineer for Grant Township; Richard Powers, Utility Board member and Grant Township trustee. Also pictured (foreground) are Janet Shea, Copper Harbor business owner; and Paul Ketola, Fort Wilkins DNR park ranger representing Dan Plescher, manager of Ft. Wilkins and Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Parks. 

 

COPPER HARBOR ’Äì The Copper Harbor Utility Board hopes to have more information to present this week to Hancock contractor MJO, potential buyer of 270 acres of waterfront in the area at the west end of Copper Harbor known as Hunters Point. MJO would like Grant Township to provide sewer services to a proposed development of about 100 home sites, including about 65 waterfront lots, between the Devil’Äôs Washtub and the village of Copper Harbor.

Meanwhile, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources is still considering negotiations with MJO, the township and The Nature Conservancy for a possible land trade that would set aside for preservation and public access the trail area along the harbor and Lake Superior lakeshore at the east end of the property. The DNR owns the land now being used by the township for its two sewage treatment lagoons, located near Fort Wilkins State Park. On Friday, March 16, MJO discussed with the Utility Board the possibility of building a third lagoon at that site to accommodate the development.

 

The board (with two members absent) indicated information from a financial planner might be necessary to determine the cost of hooking up future residences planned for the acreage that MJO hopes to buy, while MJO communicated a sense of urgency because of the March 31, 2001, deadline on their purchase option, set by landowner International Paper / Lake Superior Land Co. Township Supervisor and Utility Board member Ken Korhorn has tentatively scheduled a second meeting with MJO for 9 a.m. on Wednesday, March 21, depending on whether or not the needed information can be obtained by then.

 

’ÄúWe’Äôre endeavoring to do the best we can because you can’Äôt make an informed decision without adequate information,’Äù Korhorn said. ’ÄúI hope to make contact with some financial consultants prior to the Wednesday (March 21) meeting.’Äù

 

Richard Supina, president of Traverse Engineering and engineer for Grant Township, said a financial consultant looks at the whole operation of the utilities in order to arrive at a fair and equitable rate schedule for both the existing customers and potential customers.

 

’ÄúAt some point the added customers have to generate the dollars to cover the cost of the expansion,’Äù Supina said.

 

He noted it would be necessary to negotiate with MJO for the number of lot connections and to have a rate structure set up to accommodate that number.

 

Based on a suggestion by U.P. Engineers & Architects, Inc., MJO President Mick Oja proposed a hook-up fee of $7,500 for each of the first 18 lots proposed. He noted that was only half the cost since the developer would have to spend another $7,500 per lot for construction costs, such as putting in sewer lines. While Oja said he thought the total of $135,000 to hook up the first 18 lots should be more than sufficient, Supina suggested the board meet with a financial consultant before coming to a decision.

 

Richard Powers, Utility Board member and Grant Township trustee, said he would be working with Supina to come up with a plan of action for the Utility Board ’Äì a plan that would be in the best interest of Copper Harbor and the residents who are now using the present sewer system.

 

’ÄúNothing is set in concrete yet. We’Äôre just looking at alternatives,’Äù Powers said. ’ÄúThe Utility Board is trying to stay focused on whether or not the MJO proposal is in the best interest of Copper Harbor ’Ķ I’Äôm trying to do the best job that I can for the people of Copper Harbor.’Äù

 

Oja asked why the present ’Äúbanked capacity’Äù or reserve capacity of the two existing lagoons couldn’Äôt be used for his development, but Korhorn said a township board resolution declared last fall that any excess capacity in the present system should be reserved for those within the present usage area.

 

’ÄúYou’Äôre discriminating against me because I’Äôm over the line,’Äù Oja said.

 

Said Powers, ’ÄúIt just happens to be the position that I’Äôve been told the board took.’Äù

 

Utility Board member Peg Kauppi noted those within the area should pay for the banked capacity if the board is not going to accept the possibility of a new development paying for it.

 

Korhorn added, ’ÄúIt seemed to me to be a bit of an insurance policy. If somebody came and said I want to hook up (18-20 homes) and that capped the capacity, then what is the impact on those (now on the system) in Copper Harbor?’Äù

 

MJO’Äôs primary options would seem to be either (1) to pay its share for an additional lagoon if the DNR allows another easement on the state land where the present sewage treatment system and two lagoons are located, or (2) to build a holding lagoon on the property they intend to purchase for the development. The sewage from the development would be stored in a holding lagoon and would then be pumped up to the sewage lagoons for treatment and discharge at a time when the volume from Copper Harbor is low. The first option appears to be preferable if the state is willing to grant an easement for a third lagoon on the property it owns near Fort Wilkins.

 

Dan Plescher, who was recently transferred from Fort Wilkins to Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park but who is presently managing both parks until a new Ft. Wilkins manager is chosen, was unable to attend the meeting but commented Saturday on the Utility Board’Äôs discussion with MJO. He said the DNR would like to explore the possibility of trading a new lagoon easement for public ownership of the area of Hunters Point that includes the hiking trail from the Marina and goes to the east end of the property. This is the area MJO appears to have chosen for the first 18 lots should they purchase the property.

 

’ÄúWe don’Äôt intend to just give that property (additional lagoon space) without getting something in return,’Äù Plescher said.

 

If the area of the trail and Point (thin peninsula at its end) turns out to be worth more than the area for a third lagoon, he added, then possibly the DNR could secure the cash difference from another source such as The Nature Conservancy or the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund. The Nature Conservancy has indicated they could possibly pay for and hold the land until the state could pay them back. Plescher said he was hopeful the DNR would send a real estate representative to the March 21 Utility Board meeting.

 

Keweenaw photographer Steve Brimm said these wood lilies grow along the conglomerate on the Lake Superior shoreline of the Hunters Point area west of Copper Harbor. (Photo ©Steve Brimm / brimmages.com)

’ÄúThat’Äôs probably the last place the general public has access to for seeing the Copper Harbor shoreline, the Lake Superior shoreline and that transition of plant life that takes place between the two,’Äù Plescher said.

 

He said he believed the lagoon area could be expanded to the west. Presently most of the park facilities are hooked up to the sewage treatment system. While an additional Fort Wilkins camping area is planned for this year, Plescher said it would not add a significant amount of wastewater since plans also include eliminating some campsites.

 

’ÄúWe’Äôre putting in an additional camping loop, but we’Äôre eliminating all the lake sites in the west campground,’Äù Plesher said, ’Äúin order to provide a common area so that all the campers can enjoy the shoreline (of Lake Fanny Hooe).’Äù

 

Oja said U.P. Engineers & Architects, Inc., had expressed their concern at whether or not there were wetlands in the area of possible expansion at the lagoon site. They had also estimated the development would need a lagoon space of only 1.5 acres.

 

Supina said he wasn’Äôt sure whether or not the area has 1.5 acres of suitable land. He also estimated a need for five to 10 acres for an additional lagoon, since it would be planned for long-range, future usage, not just for the MJO development.   

 

Longtime Copper Harbor resident Rich Jamsen, general manager of Lighthouse Ferry Service and chair of the Copper Harbor Improvement Association, said he was optimistic that an agreement might be reached with MJO to trade lagoon space for public ownership of the trail to Hunters Point.

 

’ÄúIt looks like there’Äôs a good chance if we can get all the players together (MJO, the DNR, TNC and Grant Township),’Äù Jamsen said.

 

’ÄúI want to work hard to do anything to see that it gets into public ownership,’Äù Jamsen said. ’ÄúFrom a natural point of view ’Ķ it’Äôs kind of an adventure for people to go out there.’Äù

 

Jamsen noted tourists use the same Marina parking lot for the tours to the Copper Harbor Lighthouse as they do for the trail to Hunters Point and people who take the boat rides often walk the trail.

 

 Marsh marigolds like these photographed by Steve Brimm grow in the wet area at the extreme west end of the harbor. (Photo ¬©Steve Brimm / brimmages.com)

’ÄúI can’Äôt see that anyone in business in Copper Harbor wouldn’Äôt want that hiking trail to remain exactly the way it is,’Äù he said. ’ÄúIt’Äôs something else for people to do, and they stay a little longer.’Äù

 

Jamsen added the trail holds a special attraction for children, ’Äúespecially those from urban areas who haven’Äôt seen anything like this.’Äù

 

While he was unable to attend the March 16 meeting, Jamsen said he planned to be at the next Utility Board meeting on March 21 and also at the Conservation Design Workshop to be given by Rod Cortright of Michigan State University Extension on Thursday, March 22.

Copper Harbor business owner Janet Shea, a member of the Grant Township Land Use Planning Committee, presented a letter to Korhorn before the March 16 Utility Board meeting when she learned it was a working meeting that did not allow public comments. In her letter, Shea notes several concerns about the impact of the proposed MJO development on Copper Harbor.

 

’ÄúI am sure MJO is a credible contractor; also I am aware that development is inevitable, but at what cost?’Äù Shea writes. ’ÄúIf we agree to the sewer proposals being presented, we have given up any leverage or chance to influence the type of development MJO is proposing. That development as presently laid out is completely contrary to the land use planning effort underway in Grant Township ’Ķ

 

’ÄúWe are in the process now of land use planning which would encourage contractors to build conservation developments rather than a ’Äòtraditional’Äô (also known as ’Äòsprawl’Äô) development,’Äù the letter continues. ’ÄúHas MJO considered:

  • That the area he is considering is a watershed area that drains into Copper Harbor. Green lawns in a subdivision use fertilizer, which eventually ends up in Copper Harbor.
  • Connecting green space with adjoining parcels for continuity of trails, wildlife movement, rather than fragmentation of these corridors.
  • Impact of 100 new homes (350 people) and their impact on the existing community, including ’Äòtax base’Äô (higher valuations, higher taxes), ’Äòseasonal vs. year-round’Äô and their contribution to the economy of the community.

  ’ÄúWhat about the empty lots that already exist within the sewer district? Any development in these areas should be given priority for building, whether a year from now or 10 years from now. Would there be legal repercussions if we were to ’Äògive away’Äô those allocations to MJO?’Äù Shea asks.

 

Shea said after the meeting that she had invited Oja to attend the Conservation Design Workshop on March 22. Oja said he would consider it but could make no commitment yet.

 

’ÄúWe’Äôre gong to do everything in a real subdued way,’Äù he said. ’ÄúWe’Äôre not going to cut all the trees.’Äù

 

Al Gunnari, Allouez Township Land Use Planning Committee chairman, said he attended the Utility Board meeting because of a personal connection to the Copper Harbor area.

 

’ÄúI worked 20 years at the Fort,’Äù Gunnari said. ’ÄúI like the area. I just want to see that everything’Äôs going O.K. I’Äôm really not against development as long as it’Äôs done the right way.’Äù

 

Gunnari said his biggest concern is the view at Hunters Point, where his grandfather, his father and he had walked; where he has fished with his four daughters; and where he would like to take his grandchildren.

 

’ÄúI think they should have a buffer zone (trees between the trail and the development) of enough depth so you can’Äôt see houses,’Äù Gunnari said. ’ÄúThe same goes for the people who buy land out there ’Ķ. They’Äôre buying privacy. That’Äôs probably why they’Äôre buying property out there.’Äù

 

Powers indicated he would work on an answer to MJO’Äôs sewer request from a purely economic standpoint, to determine the up-front cost to the developer to support potential sewer expansion.

 

’ÄúI don’Äôt feel the Utility Board should concern itself with land swaps,’Äù Powers said. That’Äôs the concern of the Township Board ’Ķ We’Äôre going to make recommendations to the Township Board based on economics ’Äì whether or not this is good for Copper Harbor from an economic standpoint.’Äù

 

He added he planned to come up with ’Äúa position of no adverse economic impact on the wastewater customers in Copper Harbor.’Äù

 

Concerning MJO’Äôs deadline of March 31 for the purchase option with IP/LSLC, Powers said, ’ÄúI will do the best I can to get (MJO) information to help them make a decision; but the deadline is theirs, not mine.’Äù

 

Although no public input was allowed at the Utility Board meeting, Korhorn said he had heard from concerned residents.

 

’ÄúI’Äôve received a volume of emails ’Äì all suggesting or requesting that every effort be made to preserve Hunters Point,’Äù he said.

 

                                                                            ’Äì Michele Anderson

                                                                               March 18, 2001