|
Public
Access Forum stimulates questions, reactions
|
Participants in the recent Public Access Keweenaw forum mentioned The Estivants, a sanctuary of old-growth white pines just south of Copper Harbor, as an example of special places in the Keweenaw to be preserved for future generations. (Photo by Charles Eshbach)
|
CALUMET ’Äì Keweenaw residents asked some hard
questions of certain panel members during the Dec. 4
Public Access Keweenaw forum in the Calumet Theatre.
The forum, which brought together the area’Äôs
largest landowner and a diverse group of government
and community representatives, was to be the
beginning of a community-wide acceptance of the
future of public access in the Keweenaw. Public
Access Keweenaw is a broad coalition of groups and
individuals working in a non-confrontational,
cooperative manner to secure a permanent increase in
the amount of public land in the Keweenaw.
Mike Fitzgibbon of Houghton asked Jim Ekdahl,
Department of Natural Resources Upper Peninsula
field deputy in Marquette, to explain more clearly
why last year’Äôs failed land swap (with Champion
International, now International Paper/Lake Superior
Land Co.) was not considered in the public interest.
Said Ekdahl, "That particular (proposed)
land swap wasn’Äôt in the interest of the state
(because of the imbalance of values) ’Ķ I think it
will be difficult ’Ķ to find a large body of state
land that people are willing to sacrifice in that
proposition, so it may well be that what we’Äôre
realistically looking at (for the future) is ’Äì if
this land becomes available ’Äì some combination of
land that might be available to swap, some funding
from trust funds ’Äì some combination of values that
might make this proposition of interest to
International Paper."
Art Abramson, Lake States region manager for
International Paper’Äôs forest resources, added that
International Paper is still digesting its purchase
of Champion International, which is the third
acquisition it has made in as many years.
"The assumption that there is some imminent
large-scale land transaction that’Äôs about to take
place is really just that ’Äì an assumption,"
Abramson said. "And it’Äôs based on no
information that has been provided by the company,
nor any information that I’Äôve heard about or
anticipate of that nature ’Ķ Any legitimate
proposal that the State of Michigan, The Nature
Conservancy or other organization wants to bring to
the company in an atmosphere of collaborative
dialogue ’Äì we’Äôre certainly willing to consider
that. We’Äôre willing to sit down and talk about it
’Ķ But please don’Äôt assume that all of a sudden
because IP bought this land that it’Äôs now for
sale."
In response to the Ekdahl’Äôs presentation on the
Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund, Jackie
Huntoon, Michigan Tech professor of geology, noted
her own past proposal for assistance from that fund
was not accepted, although she had worked with DNR
staff on the proposal.
"At that time (about seven years ago) we
were told by the DNR people who helped us that in
general the State of Michigan didn’Äôt want to put a
lot of money into acquiring land in the UP because
we have such a small population, and so politically
for them it was a lot better to acquire land
downstate," Huntoon said.
She asked for information on the amount of money
available in that Trust Fund, the number of
proposals submitted, what percentage of these are
from downstate vs. the percentage from the UP and
what percentage of the UP proposals are funded.
Admitting he wouldn’Äôt be able to give numbers
off the top of his head, Ekdahl said the competition
for Trust Fund dollars is intense and many projects
don’Äôt get funded. The scoring process for
proposals is rigorous, he added, and the percentage
that gets funded depends on the amount of money
available and the quality of proposals in a given
year. He noted the decision may pose a question of
whether to secure a greater land mass in a remote
area or fund a recreational project for people in
urban areas. Ekdahl said members of the Trust Fund
Commission have an active interest in the UP.
"I wouldn’Äôt discourage anybody from
submitting a worthwhile proposal," he said.
Huntoon, noting that her proposals to the United
States Department of Energy owed their success to
lobbying in Congress, directed her next question to
Matt Johnson, aide to U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak,
D-Menominee, and Ann Jousma-Miller, legislative
assistant to State Sen. Don Koivisto: "How do
we get you guys to send a representative to lobby
for us ’Ķ Is that something that’Äôs appropriate
for our representatives to do?"
Said Johnson, "Definitely, keep us in the
loop, write us letters, email us, give us a call and
let us know what’Äôs going on."
Jousma-Miller nodded in agreement, and Huntoon
said she was encouraged by the reply.
Another question dealt with the kinds of
precautions loggers take before cutting into animal
habitat.
Abramson said the company provides its foresters
with field training provided by experts such as
Whitewater Associates, who help them identify rare
and endangered species. A manual identifying
endangered plant species and their likely habitat is
also available to foresters. He noted the manual is
available from botanist Steve
Chadde.
Ekdahl noted the DNR has a group that deals with
threatened and endangered species and tries to work
with corporate and private landowners to make sure
these species are protected on both public and
private lands.
Osceola Township property owner Pat Toczydlowski
reported two incidents of broken promises from
loggers working for Champion International (now IP).
In one case, Toczydlowski had asked loggers not to
cut a stand of 200-year-old hemlock trees, belonging
to the company but bordering on her property, where
she and her children had observed owls nesting. The
loggers had given their word not to cut the trees
but then did so when the family was out of town. In
a second incident, her husband Dave, who does
groundwater research, had requested, along with his
supervisor, that logging not be done in a watershed
where they were working. Again, the logger had
promised not to cut trees in the area but went back
on the promise.
"I’Äôm just curious. It all looks good on
paper; but, in my experience, there hasn’Äôt really
been the follow-through; and I hope you’Äôre going
to be better about sticking to your word,"
Toczydlowski said to Abramson.
Although Abramson told her after the forum that
he would check into the matter, Toczydlowski said
later, "I think that SFI thing (Sustained
Forestry Initiative) is nothing but a fancy PR
campaign."
Copper Harbor resident and naturalist Jim Rooks,
who conducts eco-tours in the Keweenaw, said he
could relate to Toczydlowski’Äôs complaint.
"That’Äôs how we had to fight to save the
Estivant Pines," he said. It’Äôs the loggers
pressuring the company foresters to let them cut
certain areas."
However, Rooks noted overall he liked Abramson’Äôs
openness and his description of the company’Äôs
tenets for operation.
"He pointed out the company’Äôs willingness
to listen and negotiate," Rooks said. "I
thought the company’Äôs position was very tenable. I
don’Äôt think anyone made the point that there have
been so many owners of the company land that it
makes residents suspicious of any new owner’Äôs
intent."
Joe Kaplan of Houghton compared the loss of the
old hemlock trees to the disappearance of millions
of acres of virgin white pine and noted the need to
save white pine trees for the future.
"White pine is not sustainable," Kaplan
said. "You only have one chance at those trees,
and it takes five generations to get them back. I
just think we have to start thinking about forests
in a broader sense."
|
Tony DeFalco, Lake Superior project organizer for the National Wildlife Federation
|
Tony DeFalco, Lake Superior project organizer for
the National Wildlife Federation reminded the panel
members and the audience that under the 1991 Lake
Superior Bi-National Program, the United States and
Canada, as well as state governments around Lake
Superior, agreed to protect special areas around the
lake, including what is called the "Keweenaw
megasite." Since Bete Grise South is one of
those special places, DeFalco said he wondered if IP
would continue Lake Superior Land Company’Äôs
challenge of the Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality’Äôs denial
of their request for a permit to build a road to
access a proposed development at that site, even
though the DEQ has denied the permit several times.
"I’Äôve been working on Bete Grise South for
nearly two years," De Falco said, "and we’Äôve
seen recalcitrance on the part of the company for
the protection of that land."
Abramson said IP is following the administrative
procedures set up by the DEQ in the company’Äôs
appeal of the decision.
"Our attorneys and UP Engineers are handling
the details of that for us," he said. "We
feel that we provided evidence that there would not
be harm to the environment. The DEQ made an
interpretation. We’Äôre simply challenging the
interpretation ’Ķ It’Äôs simply asking for
administrative review of the decision. The process
is provided with the law to allow for challenge of
their interpretation of the data. This is not
unusual."
DeFalco said later Abramson told him after the
forum that IP does not have a policy to behave as
they are at Bete Grise with respect to their other
properties.
Questions and discussions continued after the
forum during the reception in the Calumet Theatre
ballroom. Comments generally were positive, with
some reservations:
Hancock resident Steve Albee, a member of the
Public Access Keweenaw coalition: "I thought we
had a terrific turnout in spite of the
weather."
Eagle Harbor resident Paul Freshwater: "It
was nice to see all those people on the same stage
’Ķ I think all of them were candid, and it’Äôs a
lot easier for us to understand where everybody is
coming from when they’Äôre candid like that."
|
Ken Korhorn, Grant Township supervisor
|
Newly elected Grant Township Supervisor Ken
Korhorn: "I was pleased at the turnout ’Ķthe
quality of the presentations and the candor with
which they were expressed. I have to agree with Mr.
Kauppi that compromise will be needed."
Houghton resident Bob Brown, a member of the
Keweenaw Land Trust: "I think (the forum) was
reasonably good on the surface. I think that when we
go a little deeper it’Äôs not so good; for example,
the shoreline is all zoned resort-residential.
Nobody mentioned the zoning."
Hancock resident Barbara Manninen: "I feel
like I’Äôm one of the rare species of the Keweenaw
that’Äôs being endangered ’Ķ I think that land ’Äì
something that magnificent and beautiful ’Äì should
be beyond profit. It’Äôs too sacred to be bought and
sold."
Chassell resident Jim Alain: "I think it’Äôs
a much more productive way (than bickering and
fighting) to accomplish this. I have maintained for
years that if people want these treasures accessible
to the public, they should be making efforts to get
them under public ownership."
|
John Griffith, North Woods Conservancy president
|
North Woods Conservancy President John Griffith:
"I thought it was great ’Ķ informative. It
might have dispelled some rumors. It gave a reason
to hope that something possibly might be done with
regard to public ownership."
IP’Äôs Art Abramson: "I think it gave us an
opportunity to share where IP is at, which is very
early in a merger process ’Ķ to help people
understand that we haven’Äôt made any decisions to
change what we’Äôve been doing here to manage our
lands."
Greg Kudray, Public
Access Keweenaw member and
co-organizer of the forum: "Very successful.
When we had an initial meeting with IP, they said
they would welcome an organization that could
represent a united front of government agencies,
organizations and individuals."
Editor’Äôs note: On Friday Kudray reported:
"We had several dozen people interested in
being active with the organization, and we will
shortly be contacting them for their suggestions and
ask them to comment on a few ideas for action that
we have already identified."
|
Christa Walck, Keweenaw Land Trust president and Common Ground Core Group chair
|
Christa Walck, chair of the Core Group for Common
Ground and President of the Keweenaw Land Trust:
"I’Äôm pleased at the turnout here tonight, and
I think it represents enormous interest in retaining
public access. And this points out why we need land
use planning, because locally enacted plans are the
only thing that ultimately protect what we
value."
Editor’Äôs note: Watch for a story soon on
the Common Ground Initiative’Äôs Community Planning
Workshop held on Dec. 5 in Houghton. Common Ground
plans to have a similar workshop in Keweenaw County
in January.
Keweenaw Today welcomes readers' comments on
public access and on the forum. Click
here for the commentary board and let us know
what you think.
-Michele Anderson
December 8, 2000
|