Please Visit Our Sponsors

Local Calumet weather
 

Click Here For Complete Weather
 

Home
Live Cams
Archives
Government
Calendars
Community
Attractions
Local History
About Us
Contact Us

 

Keweenaw Commentary...See What Everyoneís Talking About!!!!


Click Here For Keweenaw Today Click Here For Keweenaw CommentaryClick Here For Keweenaw Today

County says ski resort on hold until  after referendum

Mt. Bohemia Parking Lot August 1, 2000

This photo of the parking lot under  construction at Mt. Bohemia shows what appear to be parts of ski lift  apparatus.

State permits needed for construction, safety of chair  lifts

EAGLE RIVER - Recent letters from the Keweenaw  County Zoning Administrator and the county Building Inspector to Crosswinds  Communities- attorney say the state has jurisdiction over the installation,  construction and operation permits for chair lifts the company plans to install  at the Mt. Bohemia proposed ski hill site near Lac La Belle. However, if the  lifts are interpreted as part of the ski resort, their construction is on hold -  by a decision of the County Zoning Board of Appeals - until after the November  referendum on zoning changes.

Meanwhile what appear to be parts of chair lift  apparatus are visible in the parking lot now being constructed south of the Lac  La Belle Road.

The first letter to Crosswindsí attorney Frank  Ellias, dated July 27, 2000, said, "In the opinion of the Keweenaw County Zoning  Administrator and Building Code Official, no Keweenaw County building permits  are required for the chair lift apparatuses and Keweenaw County will not be  requiring a building permit (issued by the county) for construction or operation  of these systems."

The letter was signed by William Kovaleski, Jr.,  Keweenaw County Building Code official, and Jane Pelto, Keweenaw County zoning  administrator.

"Under the Ski Area Safety Act (PA 199 of  1962), (the state) issues all the  permits for construction and operation (including safety) of chair lifts,"  Kovaleski said Monday. "Chairlifts are not covered under the state building  codes, and thatís what I enforce."

Kovaleski said he would deny any permit  application for buildings, within any zoning, which do not meet the zoning  requirements. This does not include chair lifts since they are not under his  jurisdiction, he added.

In the letter, Kovaleski and Pelto note these  permits will be issued through the State of Michigan Consumer and Industry  Services (CIS), Bureau of Commercial Services. A copy of the CIS Ski Area Safety  permit will have to be filed with the Building Code Official prior to beginning  work, and certificates of final inspection (filed) when it is completed.

Lori Donlan, communications specialist for the  CIS media office, said CIS issues permits for both construction and safety of  ski lifts.

"The Ski Lift Construction Permit does not  override the local zoning requirements," Donlan said. "Weíre more concerned  about the safety issue from our end."

The final safety permit is not given until the  ski lift is constructed and passes a state inspection, she added.

"If we find out the ski lift is constructed  properly (during a state inspection), then we give the (safety) permit," Donlan  explained. "You cannot operate a ski lift facility in Michigan unless you have a  permit from us."

While the countyís first letter does not mention  the relationship of ski lift construction to the November 7 referendum on zoning  changes, a July 28 letter from Pelto to Ellias reminds him that the Zoning Board of  Appeals, on July 10, 2000, tabled  the issue of defining permitted uses within Conservation-Environmental  Protection (CD-EP) and Resort Service (RS) zoning until after the referendum.  The referendum will allow local residents to decide whether to accept or reject:  1) changing areas currently zoned CD-EP in the area of the proposed ski hill  project to RS and 2) approving an amendment to permit ski resorts under RS  zoning.

In the second letter, Pelto says, "The County  does not require a building permit for the conveyancing system, but it is yet to  be determined whether a ski resort and its related structures will be considered  low-intensity recreation within the CD-EP zone. The Zoning Board of Appeals will  eventually determine this. Whether ski resorts and their related structures will  be a Permitted Use within RS will be determined by the referendum results in  November."

James Heikkila, zoning appeals board chairman,  said he interpreted "eventually" to mean after the referendum.

While neither Jane Pelto, who is on vacation,  nor County Attorney and Prosecutor Donna Jaaskelainen was available to interpret  the language of this paragraph, "related structures" would appear to include the  ski lifts.

At least that was the interpretation of Traverse  City Attorney Martha Black, who has been involved in the Mt. Bohemia issue  because of the petition and referendum. Black indicated Crosswinds risks  violating the Zoning Ordinance if the company attempts to build ski lifts before  the referendum.

"At present, if you start to build a ski lift  apparatus - regardless of whether the building permit is required by the county  or the state - youíre violating the Zoning Ordinance," Black said. "Currently a  ski resort is not permitted in CD-EP unless or until the Zoning Board of Appeals  says it is. A ski resort is not permitted in RS unless the voters say it is (in  the referendum)."

"If somewhere in the midst of all this  Crosswinds erects ski lifts," she said, "the county is putting its head in the  sand from the reality of the fact that theyíre going to go ahead and build a  whole ski resort in violation of the current Zoning Ordinance and before the  people have an opportunity to vote."

Mendota Lighthouse owner Gary Kohs, who was  instrumental in helping Keweenaw County voters with the petition for a  referendum, agreed Crosswinds would be violating the law if they built any ski  resort structures before the referendum.

"Thereís no doubt in my mind whatsoever that  they can expect an injunction once they attempt to erect anything pertaining to a ski hill - whether it be a light pole or a ski lift tower - in the CD-EP district, because itís illegal," Kohs said.

Crosswinds spokesman Lonie Glieberman was quoted  in The Daily Mining Gazette Monday as saying, "`The lift is the big thing  (weíre waiting on now), but everything else is going forward.î

However, Glieberman did not make it clear  whether Crosswinds considered the lifts on hold until the referendum and would  not comment on the letters from Pelto and Kovaleski.

Mark Pontti, public affairs manager for  International Paper, which is leasing the Mt. Bohemia property to Crosswinds,  said, ""We realize there are many viewpoints surrounding the Mt.Bohemia ski hill  development, and we are confident
the citizens will have the right to be  heard in November when a referendum will be offered to challenge the current  zoning approved by the Keweenaw County Board.¬ In the meantime, Crosswinds  Communities, Inc., has actual management responsibility as the project  developer."

However, Crosswinds was not willing to give Keweenaw Today a reaction to the letters.

Said Glieberman, "At this point our  (Crosswindsí) position is not to answer questions from Keweenaw  Today."

- Michele Anderson
August 1, 2000