Please Visit Our Sponsors

Local Calumet weather
 

Click Here For Complete Weather
 

Home
Live Cams
Archives
Government
Calendars
Community
Attractions
Local History
About Us
Contact Us

 

Keweenaw Commentary...See What Everyoneís Talking About!!!!


Click Here For Keweenaw Today Click Here For Keweenaw CommentaryClick Here For Keweenaw Today

County Board approves referendum language after  Crosswindsí challenge

Keweenaw County Commissioners deliberate during their  August 15 meeting in the Courthouse in Eagle River before approving the language  of the November 7 referendum on zoning changes at Mt. Bohemia. Pictured, from  far left, are County Attorney Donna Jaaskelainen, County Clerk Marilyn Winquist,  Board Chairman Lyle Peterson and commissioners Annette Gagnon, Jeff Turnquist,  Frank Stubenrauch and Gordon Roberts. In background is Kathleen Vettori,  recording the meeting for Frank Ellias, Crosswindsí  attorney.


EAGLE RIVER -- The Keweenaw  County Board of Commissioners discussed, deliberated and finally approved this  week the wording of the November referendum on Mt. Bohemia zoning changes after  a presentation by Crosswinds Communitiesí attorney Frank Elias, who challenged  the wording of the petition requesting the referendum.

The referendum will allow local residents to decide whether to accept or  reject: 1) changing areas currently zoned Conservation-Environmental Protection  (CD-EP) in the area of the proposed ski hill project to Resort Services (RS)  zoning and 2) approving an amendment to permit ski resorts - including base  lodges, lifts, storage and maintenance buildings, restaurants and related uses -  under RS zoning. A vote of yes accepts the zoning changes (approved by the  county board last spring but put on hold by the impending referendum) which will  allow Crosswinds - a developer from Novi, Mich. to complete the building of  their proposed Mt. Bohemia ski resort near Lac La Belle. A vote of no is a vote  to retain the original zoning.

County Attorney Donna Jaskelainen told the board, "When you are drafting a  language for a ballot for the referendum issue, you musy . . .  make the language  clear enough for the voters to understand what they are voting on." 

Jaaskelainen referred to Michigan  Statute 168.485 (of Act 116 of 1954), which reads:

"A question submitted to the electors of this state or the electors of a  subdivision of this state shall, to the extent that it will not confuse the  electorate, be worded so that a "yes" vote will be a vote in favor of the  subject matter of the proposal or issue and a "no" vote will be a vote against  the subject matter of the proposal or issue. The question shall be worded so as  to apprise the voters of the subject matter of the proposal or issue, but need  not be legally precise. The question shall be clearly written using words that  have a common everyday meaning to the general public. The language used shall  not create prejudice for or against the issue or proposal."

Ellias, however, cited Michigan  Statute 125.212, paragraph c, which reads:

"(c) If a petition is filed within 30 days after publication of the  ordinance, the county clerk determines that the petition is adequate and the  ordinance or part of the ordinance is approved by a majority of the registered  electors residing in that portion of the county outside the limits of cities and  villages voting on the zoning ordinance or part of the zoning ordinance at a  regular election or special election called for that purpose. The county board  of commissioners shall provide the manner of submitting the zoning ordinance or  part of the zoning ordinance to the electors for their approval and determining  the result of the election."

Ellias claimed this paragraph does not contain anything which allows anyone  the opportunity to rewrite, change or amend the petition. At the same time,  Ellias said that while the county clerk had done "an excellent job of listening  to everybody, considering a very difficult issue," she had said the petition  doesnít describe the real estate involved in the zoning changes.

However, County Clerk Marilyn Winquist had not found the petitions  inadequate.

In her July 11 letter to the board, Winquist wrote,  "After checking the signatures as to being registered voters of Keweenaw County,  I approve the petitions as to form and the required number of signatures (151  were required; I approved 263)."

Although the board approved the petition at their July 11  meeting, Ellias still held that the wording of the petition was "not  adequate" since it did not include the legal description of the property to be  rezoned, even though that description was attached to the Notice of Intent for  the petition.

"The failure to include any legal description - the failure to even put in  the words "Mt. Bohemia - is fatally defective," Ellias said. "You canít  intelligently make a decision on a real estate issue if you donít know what the real estate is."

Ellias exhibited a map showing the area of proposed zoning changes, saying,  "If no one sees a map or has any type of description, they donít realize that  the zoning was already correct for what we were trying to do. The only issue  that was being changed here was the location of various improvements . . . For  instance, (in) the proposed zoning change area (zoned) as CD-EP - weíre certain  that a low-intensive, recreational use, such as skiing, would be allowed within  that ordinance. Well, anybody who was just signing the petition, without any  legal description, had no ability to check on it."

Crosswindsí attorney Frank Ellias addresses the Keweenaw  County Board of Commissioners at their August 15 meeting in the Courthouse in  Eagle River. Ellias displayed a map showing the Mt. Bohemia zoning changes to be  proposed on the November 7 referendum. At right is Crosswindsí  Lonie Glieberman,  Mt. Bohemia project manager.


After  pointing out the need for a description of the property included in the proposed  zoning change, Ellias argued that the same petition language should be on the  referendum and changing the language would violate the "purity of elections" set  forth in every Michigan Constitution (mentioned in Article II, section 4 of the  Michigan Constitution).

"The changes to the incident petition contemplated by the clerk and the  commissioners would violate the purity of elections principle since the changes  would exceed their ministerial authority," Ellias said.

Adding that he was not saying the legal description - included in the Notice  of Intent for the petition - was intentionally left out of the petition, Ellias  still maintained that the failure to include it was "misleading and false."  After doing research on various referenda in Michigan, Ellias noted possible  minor changes in wording are acceptable for clarification. However, he noted, to  add the legal description of property to the referendum language now would be  violating the purity of elections "by impermissibly favoring the petition  backers."

"You do not have the right, at this point, to change the language," he said.  "Thereís nothing you can do tonight to correct the fact that these petitions  were not adequate."

Jaskelainen said she had checked with the state assistant attorney generalís  office and received word that the board could add, to the language on the  petition for the referendum, a legal description of the area to be rezoned or a  phrase such as "Mt. Bohemia and the surrounding area" to clarify the location of  the zoning changes.
 

Crosswindsí attorney Frank Ellias confers with Keweenaw  County Attorney Donna Jaaskelainen during the Board of Commissioners meeting on  August 15 in the Keweenaw County Courthouse in Eagle  River.


Ralph Duffek of the  Houghton-Keweenaw Cooperative Extension said his office holds non-biased  informational meetings on zoning and land use issues and they would be willing  to hold one or two public meetings to explain the referendum proposal that will  be on the November 7 election ballot.

Duffek said he was not invited by Crosswinds or by the board to make his  offer but decided on his own to attend the meeting.

"I sensed there was some controversy brewing," Duffek said Friday. "Itís a  service the Extension can provide (for counties and groups). I decided to go up  and see if they needed it . . . Our goal would be to make it clear to the public  exactly what the referendum is saying."

Duffek said one meeting and possibly two would probably be held in late  October or early November, most likely at the Mohawk School or at the Gitche  Gumee Bible Camp in Eagle River.

After deliberation, the board approved the wording for the referendum to  include a description of the areas of Sections 28, 29 and 30 ’Äì called "a portion  of Mt. Bohemia" -  now zoned CD-EP and intended to be rezoned to RS if the vote  is yes. The referendum also proposes to amend Resort Service permitted uses to  include a "Ski Resort, including base lodges, lifts, storage and maintenance  buildings, restaurants, and related uses." (See the minutes of the August 15  Board meeting for the full wording of the referendum proposal.)

Crosswinds maintains a vote of no will not prevent their building a ski hill  in the CD-EP districts; however, the county Zoning Board of Appeals would have  to approve such construction in CD-EP, and it has postponed that  decision until after the referendum.

On April 11, 2000, at the request of Lake Superior Land Co., a subsidiary of International Paper, the  Keweenaw County Board of Commissioners approved a zoning change from CD-EP to RS  in areas of Sections 28, 29 and 30 on Mt. Bohemia and an amendment to include  ski resorts as a permitted use under RS. The ski resort proposed by Crosswinds  is said to include a lodge, parking lot and 50 rental units as well as  chairlifts. The ski runs and parking lot have already been cleared and graded,  and the company has obtained soil erosion and stormwater permits from the  Michigan Department of Environmental Quality.

Board members advised by insurance reps before  August 15 meeting

EAGLE RIVER - A representative of the insurance program in which Keweenaw  County is enrolled spoke with county officials shortly before the August 15  board meeting in a closed informational meeting, following a brief committee  meeting that was open to the public. 

Jim Youngblood, vice-president of claims for the Michigan Township  Participating Plan, Attorney Dave Mecklin and Mark Hannula, independent  insurance agent for Keweenaw County, met with County Board Chairman Lyle  Peterson, County Attorney Donna Jaaskelainen, County Zoning Administrator Jane  Pelto and County Clerk Marilyn Winquist the afternoon of August 15 in the County  Courthouse.

Hannula said after he had informed the insurance representatives of the  controversial issues concerning the Mt. Bohemia ski hill project, Youngblood  decided to visit county officials in order to discuss zoning liabilities and  gather information.

"The biggest liabilities for counties involve zoning," Hannula said. "Zoning  is a hot issue no matter where it is in the state . . .Weíre in there just to  apprise our customers where or if coverage applies in matters of zoning issues."

Hannula said the main purpose of the meeting was to allow the insurance  representatives to gather information about Keweenaw County zoning issues,  including copies of minutes and ordinances. He added once the information is  compiled, an informational meeting could be held to inform the public.

"Our insurance program suggested that they (county officials) have an  informational meeting so the people will know why theyíve taken the steps they  have . . . and why they had to take these steps," he said.

Hannula noted the meeting with county officials was a good start.

"We had a very good meeting with them," he said. "Weíre progressing down the  road to the point where weíll have more information."

- Michele Anderson
August 19, 2000