Please Visit Our Sponsors

Local Calumet weather
 

Click Here For Complete Weather
 

Home
Live Cams
Archives
Government
Calendars
Community
Attractions
Local History
About Us
Contact Us

 

Keweenaw Commentary...See What Everyoneís Talking About!!!!


Click Here For Keweenaw Today Click Here For Keweenaw CommentaryClick Here For Keweenaw Today

KEWEENAW  COUNTY
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION
MINUTES
PUBLIC HEARING JULY 10, 2000

Members Present:

Members Absent:

James Heikkila, Chairman

Robert Yarger, Member

Clyde Wescoat, Vice-chair

James Regis, Member

Fritz Longpre, Member

Donna Jaaskelainen, County Prosecutor

Jane J. Pelto, Zoning Administrator

6:45 P.M.

Prosecutor: The referendum has been filed and you shou1d let the people vote  on the RS. This should be put on hold, I have done some research and a ski hill  would not be considered low-intensity especially this one because of the size of  the project and the lagoon system they will need to service it. By allowing ski  hill as a permitted use, you're taking away the peoples' right to vote. Marilyn  has authorized the signatures on the petitions.

Zoning Administrator: Is it RS now or CD-EP until the referendum is finished?

Commissioner Heikkila: The Zoning Board, The County Board, and the State  passed the zoning change. Wouldn't it be RS until the referendum is voted on?

Prosecutor: By filing the Notice of Intent, it stops the zoning change.

Commissioner Regis: There was the amendment listed as number 12 of Permitted  Uses to allow ski resorts. Is this still valid?

Administrator: All the changes that were made are on the referendum.

Commissioner Longpre: What happens if the referendum fails?

Prosecutor: It then goes to RS as approved.

Commissioner Wescoat: Who makes the determination on the validity of the  referendum?

Prosecutor: The County Board of Commissioners determines if the referendum is  valid.

Zoning Administrator: What is considered low-intensity recreation?

Commissioner Wescoat: I was thinking about that on the way here. CD-EP  considers golf courses low-intensity and golf courses use pesticides and  chemicals. I would think ski hills are less intensive than golf courses.

Commissioner Regis: Low-intensity is where you're not using mechanized  equipment.

Commissioner Heikkila: What is low-intensity? Would we have allowed this use  if the referendum wasn't filed?

Prosecutor: The CD-EP stands If it doesn't belong there, it belongs in RS.  Crosswinds has made the determination. Why would you want the zoning changed to  RS if low-intensity recreation allows ski hills?

Commissioner Heikkila: The issue could be tabled until we know the legality  of the referendum or the result of the voters.

Commissioner Regis: Ski hill is not allowed in CD-EP.

Commissioner Heikkila: We'll put the issue on hold. No permits will be issued  until the referendum issue is completed; either the legality is determined, or  the vote is completed. If the referendum doesn't pass, the zone will be RS and  will allow ski hills. If the referendum passes, we'll have to re-visit the  issue. Is there any further discussion?

7:15 P.M. Vote to go out of executive session.

James Heikkila, Chairman

Clyde Wescoat, Vice-chair

County of  Keweenaw
Clerk and Register of Deeds
HC1 Box 607 Eagle River, Michigan  49950
(906) 337-2229



MINUTES

KEWEENAW COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
"CLOSED  SESSION"
July 11, 2000

The Keweenaw County Board of Commissioners went  into closed session July 11, 2000, 7:37 P.M., in regards to referendum petitions  submitted to the County Clerk for amendment #KC-001-ROO to the Keweenaw County  Zoning Ordinance.

At the regular session of the Board, the County Clerk  submitted these petitions to the Board with her approval as to the form of the  petition and the required number of signatures of registered voters. Mr. Ellias,  attorney for Crosswinds, stated these petitions were not adequate, as there was  no attachment to them (which the wording in the petition stated there was an  Exhibit A attached) which described the legal description of the land; he said  it was the Clerkís responsibility not to approve them because there was no  attachment and the Board should not put it to a vote of the people because the  signers did not know what was being rezoned.

The Board questioned the  responsibilities of the Clerk, as she stated she had no authority to determine  the wording of the petition question.

The Prosecutor said the Clerk  approved the petition and the law states the Board SHALL submit it to the vote  of the people, and that Mr. Ellias wants the Board to make a legal opinion and  if the Board does not follow the statute she would not have a leg to stand on  for a lawsuit in court.

Turnquist said the people are saying the  prosecutor has a conflict of interest. The prosecutor responded she has remained  neutral and people will say what they want.

The session closed at 7:53  P.M.

(signed)
Marilyn Winquist, Clerk