Local Calumet weather
 

Click Here For Complete Weather
 

Keweenaw Commentary...See What Everyone’Äôs Talking About!!!!

Click Here For Keweenaw Today Click Here For Keweenaw CommentaryClick Here For Keweenaw Today

Black Bear to request township apply for sewer grant; DEQ responds to concerns while permit delayed

 

Concerned citizens raised questions about the possible impact of the proposed Mt. Bohemia sewage treatment system on these wetlands near the proposed site of the lagoons and spray irrigation area. Developer Black Bear plans to request that Grant Township apply for grant money to fund the system. (Keweenaw Today file photo)

MARQUETTE ’Äì The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality has responded to questions concerning Black Bear Entertainment, Adventure & Recreation Company’Äôs discharge permit application for the proposed Mt. Bohemia sewage treatment system. In its ’ÄúSummary of Comments and Responses’Äù document, the DEQ answers questions raised both before and after the January 24, 2001, public hearing on the Part 31 Groundwater Discharge Permit application. However, certain issues, such as the ownership of the land where the developer proposes to build the lagoon and spray irrigation system, have delayed issuance of the permit. Meanwhile, Black Bear intends to request that Grant Township apply for government grant money to fund the system,  although the Part 31 application is intended for a private system.

.

The Grant Township Board will consider the request at their meeting scheduled for 7 p.m. on Wednesday, April 11, at the Copper Harbor Community Building. Grant Township Supervisor Ken Korhorn said he was not sure what response the board would make to the request. The agenda for the meeting allows for public comment to follow a presentation by Black Bear President Lonie Glieberman.

 

’ÄúThere are many who wonder what benefit there would be for Grant Township (to apply for the grant(s),’Äù Korhorn said Tuesday.

 

Korhorn said he was not sure which granting agencies would be involved. Last year, at about this time, Crosswinds, Inc., (Black Bear’Äôs parent company) requested that the Keweenaw County Board of Commissioners apply for state and federal grants totaling more than $900,000 to fund the Mt. Bohemia sewage treatment system, but the board voted against it after receiving advice on liability from Keweenaw County Prosecuting Attorney Donna Jaaskelainen. The potential grant applications at that time were addressed to the Economic Development Administration (federal funds under the United States Department of Commerce) and to the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (state funding known as the Community Development Block Grant, or CDBG).

 

Lac La Belle residents Guy and Betty Snyder were among the local residents who wrote letters to the DEQ opposing the Mt. Bohemia sewer system plans. Their main concern is that any break or malfunction in the system could pollute Lac La Belle, the Montreal River and Lake Superior, as well as residents’Äô water supply. Guy Snyder said Monday he would not be in favor of Grant Township applying for the grant.

 

’ÄúThey turned it down at the county level,’Äù Guy Snyder said. ’ÄúWhy should Grant Township take that responsibility on their own?’Äù

 

Randy Conroy, DEQ senior district geologist in the Waste Management Division, Marquette office, said if Black Bear, through the township, applies for a grant to fund the wastewater treatment system, that could delay both issuance of the Part 31 permit and construction of the system. While a Part 31 discharge permit is for a private system, Conroy, who has been reviewing the permit application, said his preference would be to define the system as public if Black Bear did apply for grant money through the township. A public system has more than one owner and normally requires a Part 41 construction permit.

 

’ÄúWe don’Äôt see how it could be constructed this year if they delay by pursuing the grant option,’Äù Conroy said. ’ÄúThat type of delay jeopardizes the project as a whole.’Äù

 

Conroy noted the DEQ’Äôs response to Question #4 in their ’ÄúSummary’Äù document, concerning the Pump & Haul permit, says, ’ÄúThe current structures at Mt. Bohemia and restroom facilities are temporary. Temporary provisions for wastewater treatment will not be considered by the Department beyond the 2000-2001 ski season.’Äù

 

Thus, since the DEQ will not issue a Pump & Haul, if Black Bear does not complete construction of a lagoon system by the beginning of the 2001-2002 season, their only option would be to request an extension from the Western Upper Peninsula Health Department for the temporary restrooms for which that Department granted a six-month permit this season.

 

Said Conroy, ’ÄúWhether the Health Department would or would not depends on how safe they feel the operation has been and will be in the future.’Äù

 

Conroy noted the main obstacle to the DEQ issuing the Part 31 permit now is the land ownership question ’Äì an issue that was raised at the January 24 public hearing on the permit applications. 

 

During the January hearing, Vern Simula, chair of the Lake Superior Alliance, pointed out that Black Bear had listed themselves as owning the 60 acres of land selected for the lagoon and spray irrigation system, but had not yet purchased it from Lake Superior Land Co./International Paper. Simula also noted the area would have to be removed from Commercial Forest (CFR) designation in order to conform to the Commercial Forest Act.

 

Black Bear’Äôs attorney Frank Ellias replied during that hearing that the developer was negotiating a contract for the purchase of the 60 acres of the treatment system and discharge area and he expected the closing on the property to be soon. It would then be removed from CFR, he added. However, Black Bear apparently has not purchased this property.

 

Conroy said the permittee must either own the land or provide written permission from the landowner to discharge on the property.

 

’ÄúThey have not provided the current landowner’Äôs permission to discharge (nor have they) purchased the property themselves,’Äù Conroy said recently.

 

In his Feb. 8, 2001 letter to Richard Wuori, project manager for U.P. Engineers and Architects, Inc., Conroy said, ’ÄúPlease have the property owner provide written permission to discharge on property not owned by the applicant. As a condition of the permit, Black Bear Entertainment Adventure and Recreation Company, Inc. (BBEA&RC) would be required to obtain an easement to access the land for project construction and long-term maintenance purposes. Alternatively, BBEA&RC can provide the warranty or land contract identifying them as the landowner.’Äù

 

It would also be the responsibility of the landowner to remove the land from CFR, which can take several months.

 

If the township applies for a grant to fund the system, they become the permittee for a discharge permit. The permittee must either own the land or obtain permission from the landowner to discharge the wastewater into the environment.

 

Simula said the DEQ responses since the hearing illustrate the importance of citizens’Äô role in the permit review process.

 

’ÄúCitizens raised issues that the DEQ had apparently not considered, but all these issues were critical to the adequacy of the permit and also critical to assuring protection of Michigan groundwater,’Äù he noted. ’ÄúThe land ownership was a glaring inaccuracy and inadequacy in this application.’Äù

 

Simula added the actual location of the pipeline could have significant implications for the county. His letter to the DEQ mentioned a need for backup systems and emergency response measures.

 

Margie Ring, DEQ senior engineer in Waste Management, wrote to Wuori on Feb. 8, 2001. After reviewing the plans and specifications submitted by UP Engineers & Architects with the application of Oct. 24, 2000, Ring identified in her letter several deficiencies to be addressed. The information she requested from U.P. Engineers included:

¬…        providing details on forcemain construction and installation requirements, including clarification of trench details;

¬…        providing an adequate alarm system with battery backup power supply for periods of power failure and with warnings for pump failure, power failure, high or low water, seal failure and unauthorized entry;

¬…        making pump stations accessible to maintenance vehicles;

¬…        improving strength and durability of the proposed forcemain material;

¬…        amending construction plans to move the pond level control structure further west to allow for better mixing within the lagoons;

¬…        including in the pond level control structure an unvalved emergency overflow with provisions for discharge to the environment and rip-rap for erosion control. 

 

As of late March, Ring said she had not yet received revised plans and specifications addressing these deficiencies. Both Ring and Wuori are on vacation this week and were unavailable for an update.

 

Conroy said UP Engineers have revised their Irrigation Management Plan to shorten the discharge season (originally planned for May to mid-November and now for May to mid-September) and increase the land application rates. The shorter season was in response to one of the concerns expressed in letters from Jim Mihelcic, Michigan Tech professor of civil and environmental engineering. Mihelcic had pointed out that Northern Hardwoods’Äô ability to take up nitrogen through the spray irrigation system would be decreased in cold weather.

 

’ÄúMy concern,’Äù Conroy noted, ’Äúis that you’Äôre forcing water through the root zone (of the trees), and it needs adequate retention time.’Äù

 

This photo was taken last fall shortly after the DEQ did soil testing in the area of the proposed lagoon system. The DEQ offers this response to erosion concerns: ’ÄúSlopes in the spray irrigation area are not excessive. Permeable, medium textured sand soils will promote infiltration of rain and snowmelt not overland flow Spray irrigation can not occur if standing water is present pursuant to Rule 2204(2)(b).’Äù  

As for Mihelcic’Äôs question on the low pH of the soil, Conroy said, ’ÄúWe’Äôre not relying on the pH of the soils to treat the wastewater.’Äù

 

The response document states that the discharge standard will be achieved by pre-treatment of phosphorus in the lagoons, proper management of sludge (containing trace metals) and denitrification through nutrient uptake removal.

 

In his letter of Jan. 28, 2001, Mihelcic’Äôs recommends, as he did in an earlier letter, that, because of the northern climate, the DEQ consider an organic loading rate of 10-15 lbs. BOD /acre/day as opposed to the DEQ’Äôs proposed loading rate of 20 lbs. BOD/acre/day.

 

The DEQ’Äôs response document states, ’ÄúThis lagoon system has been designed at 20 pounds per acre organic loading and is typical of lagoon treatment systems designed in the Upper Peninsula even for direct discharge to surface water.’Äù

 

Concern for surface water, mentioned by several residents in letters to the DEQ, because of the treatment system’Äôs proximity to wetlands leading to the Montreal River, does not appear to be a concern of the DEQ Waste Management Division. Their response document says, ’ÄúThe treated wastewater will be applied at agronomic rates, which will limit the nutrient application to the removal capacity of the soils and Northern Hardwoods. Nearby wetlands and rivers will not be adversely affected by the proposed discharge.’Äù

 

Vern LeBlanc poses in front of his family camp last fall before Black Bear purchased the building, located near the proposed site for the Mt. Bohemia wastewater treatment system. Lake Superior Land Co./International Paper would not renew the lease, although the family had leased the land for 40 years. They were offered a possible lease on the other side of the Lac La Belle Road, but they found Black Bear had already leased the sites being considered. So far they have not found a replacement site.   

Betsy resident Vern LeBlanc, who shared a camp in the area proposed for the lagoons with friends and relatives, said wetlands are located about 1,000 feet from the areas where the DEQ sampled the soil for the sewage treatment site last fall.

 

’ÄúIf they were really going to check the water flow (in the wetland), now would be the time to do it,’Äù LeBlanc said. All that water (from spring melt) flows down about ¬º mile into a tributary that goes into the Montreal River ’Ķ I think they chose a very poor spot (because of the wetlands).’Äù

 

At the January hearing, Sandra Harting, president of the Association Working Against Keweenaw Exploitation (AWAKE) also expressed concern about possible pollution of the Montreal River through the wetlands and potential contamination of Lac La Belle should the system develop a crack or leak. Harting called for baseline monitoring of both Lac La Belle and the Montreal River before the sewer goes in and more monitoring after the system is in operation so that any changes in water quality can be determined.

 

Conroy said his staff has made the Surface Water Quality Division of the DEQ aware of this public concern for the surface water quality of nearby wetlands, Lac La Belle and the Montreal River. The Surface Water Quality Division’Äôs decision to conduct a survey would be based on potential threat to these waters and the availability of funding.

 

Click here to comment on this article ’Ķ

 

                                                                                ’Äì Michele Anderson

                                                                                  April 11, 2001